<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final Cut Server, a true solution.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lwees.com/2008/05/15/final-cut-server-a-true-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lwees.com/2008/05/15/final-cut-server-a-true-solution/</link>
	<description>Technology in my own words.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.lwees.com/2008/05/15/final-cut-server-a-true-solution/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lwees.com/?p=503#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,

I'm glad I got your take on this since you are actually using it. I think that when it gets to 2.0 the software will be better, unless you guys at Adobe do something about it. Thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I got your take on this since you are actually using it. I think that when it gets to 2.0 the software will be better, unless you guys at Adobe do something about it. Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.lwees.com/2008/05/15/final-cut-server-a-true-solution/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lwees.com/?p=503#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Actually, there's not much in the 1.0 version that is unique to Final Cut Pro users.  I've been working with it for about a week.  The only advantage that FCP users enjoy is that when you check out a Final Cut Studio project, it knows which assets should go with it.  I'm sure this will change in time.  Presumably at some point they'll add back the rough cut editor they were showing at NAB 2007, for example.  

But in the meantime, I'm learning to use it with the Adobe Production Premium suite and it's working about as well as any other asset manager.  I have my gripes about it but I'm going to give it some time before I'm ready to vent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there&#8217;s not much in the 1.0 version that is unique to Final Cut Pro users.  I&#8217;ve been working with it for about a week.  The only advantage that FCP users enjoy is that when you check out a Final Cut Studio project, it knows which assets should go with it.  I&#8217;m sure this will change in time.  Presumably at some point they&#8217;ll add back the rough cut editor they were showing at NAB 2007, for example.  </p>
<p>But in the meantime, I&#8217;m learning to use it with the Adobe Production Premium suite and it&#8217;s working about as well as any other asset manager.  I have my gripes about it but I&#8217;m going to give it some time before I&#8217;m ready to vent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
